Congratulations to Richard Branson for running Europe's first biodiesel train.
However, regular readers will know that one of the biggest complaints that we have is the high level of tax levied on biofuels by the government. And in his press release Branson makes it clear that one of the factors that has enabled this trial is a concession with the government on the fuel duty that they will be paying to a level which will make it commercially viable. Indeed, in the notes accompanying the last budget there was advance notice that there would be trials to establish the correct level of taxation of biofuels for off road use. And it didn't take a rocket scientist to work out that they were talking about Virgin Trains.
Biofuels currently get a 20p a litre reduction in road fuel duty - which so far the Prime - Minister in Waiting has trumpeted as part of the Government's commitment to carbon reductions. The truth is that biofuels are significantly more expensive to produce than petroleum fuels, the price of the raw materials is significantly more volatile and the 20p a litre rebate is not enough to make them competitive.
Mr Branson as we all know is no fool. He has pledged massive investment in biofuels over the next decade and putting pressure on the government to reduce the level of taxation is a key part of that.
We're right behind you....
For those of you who are wondering - my 360 degree feedback site is now sitting at number 15 on google.com and the reason for the change in layout of my blog is to try and escape Google's dreaded Supplemental Index.
Friday, June 08, 2007
Saturday, June 02, 2007
Spinning on the Axis of Evil
It was never going to be long before the Whitehouse Muppet had another go at destroying the planet. This time apparently it's his ego in the face of the United Nations that seems to be at the root of it.
Shortly before the G8 summit Bush decides that it would be a good idea to launch his own climate change agenda, outside of that which has been painstakingly put together by the UN, effectively destroying any chance of making progress in the immediate future. Clearly this is a diversionary tactic - but why?
We can only presume - apart from his already proven stupidity, Christian fundamentalist credentials and arrogance, that he wants to avoid being seen to make a U-turn, particularly after the hard time that the UN gave him over Iraq. If climate change were not such a serious issue there would be some satisfaction to be had from gloating over his fuckwit behaviour.
The question remains, however, how many of the major developed nations will follow the Bush administration's lead in favour of the UN. Not many I would imagine - and I suspect that when the history books are written the Bush era will be seen as a watershed marking the point at which the wane of America as a world power became irreversible.
Let's hope so - the planet cannot afford another Bush.
Shortly before the G8 summit Bush decides that it would be a good idea to launch his own climate change agenda, outside of that which has been painstakingly put together by the UN, effectively destroying any chance of making progress in the immediate future. Clearly this is a diversionary tactic - but why?
We can only presume - apart from his already proven stupidity, Christian fundamentalist credentials and arrogance, that he wants to avoid being seen to make a U-turn, particularly after the hard time that the UN gave him over Iraq. If climate change were not such a serious issue there would be some satisfaction to be had from gloating over his fuckwit behaviour.
The question remains, however, how many of the major developed nations will follow the Bush administration's lead in favour of the UN. Not many I would imagine - and I suspect that when the history books are written the Bush era will be seen as a watershed marking the point at which the wane of America as a world power became irreversible.
Let's hope so - the planet cannot afford another Bush.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
